This topic contains 0 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by 
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
-
Posts
-
In a round-about way, I guess it is.
The only argument that I’ve heard against the Argy inclusion (other than the poor things play too much) is that they’re not really at the same level as the other 3. Well of course they’re not, they don’t get the exposure.
I just can’t work it out. World rugby desperately needs another top nation, and the 3N is so f**king boring it needs another team.
I’m surprised the Saffers don’t push it more too; it’d help their chances of winning it.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.